Madison spends $400,000 to study police, gets ‘few answers’ — while bullets fly

‘Few answers in report on police’

Good on Chris Rickert. I’m sure he misses his opinion column on Page 2 of the Wisconsin State Journal but, given the contracting news business, at least he is doing honest labor as the Madison city hall reporter. Mostly indoor work. No heavy lifting.

Click to Sign the Petition!

Tell Madison to hire more police!

Chris has come over to the dark side here at The Stately Manor with his report today (01-02-18) on the Madison police proctology, aka the search for implicit bias, latent racism, white privilege, white-robed night riding, and general loucheness. The headline over his story in this morning’s print edition sums up what the Blaska Policy Werkes concluded six weeks ago: “Few answers in report on police.” (Find the on-line story here.)

For $400,000 the Madison Common Council purchased a report from a Berkeley, California boutique that:

  • Says nothing about how many more police should be hired, if any. Because the City didn’t ask whether staffing levels were adequate. Can you believe it!
  • Makes no recommendation on police body cameras. A major policy question, unanswered.
  • Reaches no conclusion on whether the racial disparity in criminal arrests is due to police racism or a racial disparity in the number and severity of crimes committed. Which, one might think, was the purpose of the study to begin with.

  • Blames Madison Police for “marginalizing” complainants as anti-police. “Until an agency fully values and embraces insight and criticism from all of its community, it will not be able to fully engage with that community.” Reality? The local Black Lives Matter contingent ARE anti-police.
  • Admits to Rickert that its one tangible recommendation, for an independent police department auditor, is not authorized by state statue as we pointed out in November after the OIR Group previewed its study.

More bureaucrats to monitor an effective police agency?

Lousy T-shirtWe said that the proposed auditor reporting to an independent “community review board” clearly violates state statute UNLESS that review board is the duly constituted police and fire commission. The State of Wisconsin mandates uniform management of municipal police departments.

Ald. Paul Skidmore makes a telling point in Rickert’s news story; that being that the auditor has no authority to “monitor” (in OIR’s verbiage) the MPD. Courts appoint monitors for police departments under consent decrees. That does not describe MPD.

Indeed, as the OIR Group states:

MPD is far from “a Department in crisis,” in spite of the controversy and turmoil that ultimately led to our project. Instead, as detailed below, we found much to admire and commend. There are areas in which MPD is unusually progressive, effective, and “ahead of the curve” when it comes to training and the evolution of best practices. Many of the Department’s policies and organizational structures are solid and often innovative, and their efforts to connect with all aspects of the public they serve are conscientious and often laudable. It is, in short, an agency with many strengths.

Koval study cityWe soon learned of Madison and MPD’s well-deserved reputation as pioneers in police science and as a cradle of progressive “problem-oriented policing” strategies … for its response to issues involving the mentally ill, and its impressive strides in recruitment, hiring and increasing gender diversity among its ranks. And we were soon informed of the specialized officer programs focusing on community policing initiatives.

Rickert picks up on the Squire’s well considered mockery of the OIR Report:

At least a quarter of OIR”s 146 recommendations are for the city or police to “consider” some new approach, “continue” an existing approach, or “modify,” “amend” or otherwise tweak something it’s already doing.

Mark your calendars: The Madison Police Department Policy & Procedure Review Ad Hoc Committee will formally review its $400,000 study of the police at 6 p.m. Thursday, January 11 in Common Council chambers.

More police, please

Stray bullets continue to just miss mothers and children in their beds (story here).

Ald. Skidmore will formally introduce his budget amendment tonight asking for eight Madison police officers at $416,385 (including fringe benefits, uniforms, etc.) and three more marked squad cars for $163,530. The measure will not be debated or voted tonight but likely at the Council’s Tuesday, January 16 meeting. Unfortunately, the measure needs 15 votes from the 20 alders because it amends the recently approved 2018 budget.

Tell Mayor Soglin and the alders to support the Madison Police Department by hiring more officers. Send this e-mail today!

Blaska’s Bottom Line: Want to restore confidence in the police and respect for the law? Stand up Mayor Soglin and alders for your Madison police rather than allowing them to twist in the wind.

Advertisements

About David Blaska

Madison WI
This entry was posted in Crime, Madison city government, Race and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Madison spends $400,000 to study police, gets ‘few answers’ — while bullets fly

  1. Kevin Wymore says:

    Wasn’t there a component of the study in which the consultants performed a community survey about citizen attitudes toward the Madison police? Whatever happened to that? Will it be released?

    Like

  2. madisonexpat says:

    General Loucheness has been executed. .. pour encourager les autres.
    Next!

    Like

  3. Gary L. Kriewald says:

    I’m surprised you didn’t pounce on the phrase from the report that refers to “the controversy and turmoil that ultimately led to our project.” What controversy and turmoil? The collective hissy-fit of a few privileged white liberals on the City Council? The bogus outrage of BLM thugs? The unquenchable desire of Madison’s “civic leaders” to parade their self-awarded virtue before their adoring fans? Here’s the lie at the bottom of this whole shameless fiasco–the only turmoil in the MPD was that caused by the sanctimonious posturing of those determined to wage war on the police. If you want names, just scan a few of the recent posts by our beloved Squire. I suggest that a year from now he conduct an audit to determine how many of the recommendations suggested by the “experts” from Berkeley were actually implemented.

    Like

  4. richard lesiak says:

    So what’s your beef Dave? The “war on cops” is as hollow as the “war on Xmas.” You say a quarter of the report says the cops need to tweak what they are already doing. What about the other 75%? What did that say? Looks like your only complaint is the cost. Just because your blood test comes back negative doesn’t mean you don’t pay for it. Maybe they should have spent the money studying Milw and that guy who walked around with 45 medals he bought at a pawn shop. That would have saved a ton of money on law suits. Why not expand your beat to the capital; that’s where the real waste of money is.

    Like

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s