To pay for Democrats’ war on success!
Democrats keep bailing out Republicans. They derided the Republican legislature’s tax cut package as a Billionaire giveaway. Not enough redistribution. It’s what they do: play class warfare.

When Evers vetoed the tax cuts for the rich, Vos went ballistic. … Why was Vos so angry? Because Evers refused to play the game of oligarchy.
— John Nichols
While Comrade John enjoys playing the game of oligarchy, the Legislative Fiscal Bureau took a balanced look at Gov. Tony Evers’ veto.
• Taxpayers reporting $60,000 to $70,000 of household income, which is about the state’s median average — will get $44 in tax relief; Republicans would have given them $249.
• Taxpayers making between $90,000 and $100,000 will receive a $48 cut under Evers’ plan instead of the $515 under Republicans’ plan.
• Across all taxpayers, Evers: $36 or 0.9%; Republicans $573 or 15.1%.
Democrats need to explain their parsimony while sitting on a $7 Billion budget surplus!
Abortion issue neutralized?
A Dane County judge is doing her best to tilt the abortion issue back in Republicans’ favor. Guess what? That 1849 Wisconsin law doesn’t ban abortion after all! It only penalizes an attack resulting in the loss of the child (supposedly). Only in Dane County! But we’ll take it!
If that decision holds, the issue defaults to a 1985 law (§ 940.15) that made abortion a crime only after viability but even then permitted abortion to save the life of the mother. That puts the ball in the other court. Need to remind folks that the U.S. Supreme Court did NOT ban abortion, it just said the practice was not guaranteed in the Constitution. That decision, against the background of Wisconsin’s 1849 law, is credited with electing a pro-abortion state supreme court justice this past April. But only 32% of Wisconsinites think abortion should be legal in all circumstances — another 34% in most cases, the Marquette Law School poll tells. The trick is finding that sweet spot with that 34 percent.
Wisconsin’s Democratic(ic) governor also protected the 189 state university diversity, equity, and inclusion bureaucrats — allowing the legislature’s $32 million funding cut to be applied elsewhere. Nationally, Democrats also seem determined to pay off college debt for grievance studies majors, a recent entry on its victim ledger, and to defend affirmative action, despite its general unpopularity.
Is affirmative action immaterial?
On the way to making the point that only 6% of all college students attend schools with an acceptance rate at or below 25%, The New York Times put up a fascinating graphic of applicant acceptance rates by institution. The faceless bureaucrats here at the Werkes picked out this sampling (flagship campuses unless noted):
Harvard, MIT, Stanford, Columbia 4%.
Dartmouth, Duke 6%
Northwestern, U of Chicago 7%
Cornell 9%
Harvey Mudd 10%
UCLA 11%
Southern Cal 13%
California-Berkeley 14%
Notre Dame 15%
North Carolina 20%
Michigan 20%
Texas 30%
Florida 30%
Eastern New Mexico University 33%
Howard 35%
Georgia 40%
Penn State 55%
Ohio State 57%
Wisconsin, Illinois 60%
Rutgers 68%
Purdue 69%
Minnesota 73%
UW-Eau Claire 78%
Nebraska 81%
UW-Whitewater 83%
Marquette, Iowa 86%
UW-Oshkosh, Stevens Point 90%
UW-Stout 91%
UW-Parkside 92%
Georgia State 95%
It's more difficult to get into Harvey Mudd than UW-Madison! (???)
Attend to your knitting
An obscure part of the State of Wisconsin’s bailout of Milwaukee: the City must maintain police and firefighter staffing levels or risk losing tens of millions of dollars in state aid. In other words, the taxpayers of Wisconsin are not going to keep propping up a dying city and your street car experiment if you can’t control street-level gunfire!
Political Rohrschach test: John Nichols calls WI Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, “one of the wealthiest individuals ever to lead a Wisconsin legislative chamber.” To John’s fellow socialists, this is a slur. To the rest of us, we’re thankful successful people want to serve in the legislature for an annual salary of $57,000. In any event, we doubt that Vos is as wealthy as Bernie Sanders, co-author with Comrade Nichols of It’s O.K. to be angry about capitalism.
→ “Here’s how the Vermont Senator became a socialist millionaire.”
Blaska’s Bottom Line: Blaska would say it’s O.K. to be thankful about capitalism. Elsewise, how would Bernie afford that lakeside vacation home?

11 responses to “Pennies for taxpayers”
[…] This post originally appeared at https://davidblaska.com/2023/07/10/pennies-for-taxpayers/ […]
“Here’s how the Vermont Senator became a socialist millionaire.”
If Sanders had a lick of sense, and wasn’t so lazy that he got kicked out of a commune, he’d be a Socialist Billionaire like Bill DeBlasio.
The Gotch
No one should be surprised at the breathtaking dimensions of liberal (or socialist) hypocrisy. It’s not like the media is about to expose them–or even hint that their sanctimonious posturing is anything less than sincere.
“Or would you rather emulate North Korea?”
This tired game is always played by people who enjoy demonizing “the left”. The point is to hammer over and over the word association of “socialism” with “evil totalitarianism”. It’s a propaganda mind control trick; these need a lot of repetition and can’t be bothered with facts or nuance.
But in reality, a democracy can implement socialist policies without being a murderous totalitarian regime.
And remember dear readers, Marx wasn’t against anyone becoming rich – he was against people using others’ labor to get rich. In other words, if Jim can plant and harvest more crops than Bob, it’s ok that Jim has more food than Bob.
This is the heart of the problem with Capitalism: Making money without working. It’s like a drug…
Wasn’t it Marx that said,”From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs”? This implies that as long as there is a “need” there will be no rich.
You are very correct Rollie. Just watch the posts here that are repeating the same name calling over and over. Vos was so upset that he took time off his vacation in Brussels to call Evers. Poor bastard. I wonder what gop donor paid for that? I love the fact that Tony told these assembly whores to pound sand. NO COMPROMISE. I’m sure Vos has WILL on speed dial to start the lawsuit and piss more of our money away.
Are their any successful socialist countries?
“Are their any successful socialist countries?”
Oh Ye of Little Faith, of course there are; you don’t recall the frantic rush into the Socialista Paradise of East Germany when the Berlin Wall came down…?
Not only that, but their greatest strength has unequivocally been preventing…um…Over-Population…
Democracy And Diversity Are What Socialists Say When Out Of Power; Tyranny And Authoritarianism Are What They Practice Once In Power.
The Gotch
I wish this country would embrace socialism and the everyone would be happy like other socialist countries.
Thiner. Definitely thinner.
Some would be a little deader, too.