Implicit bias boomerangs, hits virtue signalers!

He’s just 17 years old? ‘No one need ever forgive him’

fingerwaggingoldwomanGet ready for four years of virtue signaling.  Wisconsin’s new lieutenant governor Mandela Barnes gives every evidence he will be Gov. Tony Evers’ designated scolder. Worthy successor to Barack Obama, complete with lecturing finger.

Barnes passed judgment swift and certain that the boys from Covington KY  — white,  pro-life and wearing Trump MAGA caps — at the foot of Lincoln Memorial are guilty as charged. According to the WI State Journal, Barnes on Monday called the Native American drum-pounder Nathan Phillips, an “American hero” and the teenagers a “mob” who surrounded and taunted him. 

As a Man of Color, Phillips is presumed — pre-judged — to be the victim in the Great Liberal Victim eschatology. The white boys, predators. The slaver DNA still percolating in their veins.


kathy griffin sandmann


Punch that kid in the face!

For once, the usually milquetoast-ed David Brooks of the New York Times captures the zeitgeist of identity politics. The headline of his column will make you weep: “How We Destroy Lives Today.

You had a gentle, 64-year-old Native American man being swarmed by white (boo!), male (boo!), preppy (double boo!) Trump supporters (infinite boo!). If you are trying to rub the pleasure centers of a liberal audience, this is truly a story too good to check.

Saturday was a day of liberal vindication. See! This is what those people do! This is who they really are. Reza Aslan, the religious scholar, tweeted a photo of the main Covington boy and asked, “Have you ever seen a more punchable face than this kid’s?” The filmmaker Michael Green showed the same image and tweeted: “A face like that never changes. This image will define his life. No one need ever forgive him.”

The institutions in charge of serving the boys did what institutions always do in the face of a social media mob. They cratered. The school and archdiocese apologized. The mayor of Covington denounced them.

On Sunday several longer videos emerged showing that most of what Phillips had told the media was inaccurate. The incident actually started when members of the hate cult — the Black Hebrew Israelites — started hurling racist and homophobic slurs at the boys.

Here be the larger video:

Fake Science

We circle back to Madison where the City’s racial equity coordinator blames “white supremacist B.S.” for her failure to get enough signatures to get on the ballot. Her job, near as we can figure, is to conduct implicit bias training.

mv5bytdinjllzgqtogy4ys00ntljlwfhnzityje3owe5njuzztm4xkeyxkfqcgdeqxvymtq2mjqyndc-_v1_ux182_cr00182268_al_Heather Mac Donald tells us that “Implicit bias has spawned a multimillion-dollar consulting industry, along with a movement to remove the concept of individual agency from the law. … Nearly 200 CEOs signed a pledge to pack their employees off to implicit-bias training, … President Obama sent federal law-enforcement personnel to implicit-bias training; many local police departments are doing the same, spending millions of dollars that could be used instead to improve officers’ tactical and communication skills.”

Only problem is, this bias training increasingly is being viewed as voodo science. We turn to a professor of social psychology at Rutgers University and a former fellow and consulting scholar at the Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences at Stanford University. In Psychology Today, Dr. Lee Jussim writes:

lee jessimAlmost everything about implicit bias is controversial in scientific circles. It is not clear what most implicit methods actually measure; their ability to predict discrimination is modest at best, their reliability is low; early claims about their power and immutability have proven unjustified. And yet colleges and corporations have been rushing to institute implicit bias trainings in (misguided and unlikely to be effective) attempts to reduce discrimination.

The overselling of implicit bias has, in my view, along with several other wildly oversold concepts (micro-aggressions, stereotype threat, white privilege), contributed to the toxic environment on many campuses and in some corporations in which speech is considered violnece and which, if you say the wrong thing, you can be denounced, ostracized, and even fired.

David Brooks’ Bottom Line: “The Covington case was such a blatant rush to judgment — it was powered by such crude prejudice and social stereotyping — I’m hoping it will be an important pivot point.”

If You Still Think Nick Sandmann’s Smile Is Proof of Racism, You’re Seeing What You Want to See

Advertisements

About David Blaska

Madison WI
This entry was posted in identity politics, Uncategorized and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

42 Responses to Implicit bias boomerangs, hits virtue signalers!

  1. David Brooks’ Bottom Line: “The Covington case was such a blatant rush to judgment — it was powered by such crude prejudice and social stereotyping — I’m hoping it will be an important pivot point.”

    It might very well be a pivot point but I fear it won’t be the pivot point that we would like.

    Like

  2. Cornelius Gotchberg says:

    Someone best check in on @Anonybob; he may be shivering out on a ledge, swinging from a basement beam, or opening his veins in a warm tub.

    Why? He hasn’t looked at anything but that still of Sanderson and Phillips since Saturday, and, welp; you’s know the rest of the story, the truth will harsh his mellow.

    OTOH, the lucid have seen Lefty’s Perfect Storm limp in from the cold harsh reality of a fact-based Universe in a manner that couldn’t possibly be any more pathetic. C’mon, even Joy Behar is laughing at ’em??

    Not only that, but this rivals the abject failure of the November Blue Trickle and the Justice Kavanaugh (dis)appointment.

    It gets worse.

    Lefty now thinks spirituality is cool…for the time being leastways…and so long as it’s Native American & has nothing to do with Christianity or Judaism**

    **Unless that Judaism is connected to the racist, hateful, homophobic, xenophobic…I mean perpetually aggrieved protected class/victim group Black Hebrew Israelites.

    Confusing times for Lefty, am I right?

    Business as usual!

    The Gotch

    Like

    • AnonyBob says:

      Calm yourself, Gootchikins, I’m still here and feeling fine. I’ve watched all the videos shot from various angles. There were nuances to the situation, of course (not that you guys normally care about nuance), but the videos still show a smirking privileged white kid in a Trump hat rudely and arrogantly blocking the path of an elderly man. I don’t give a rat’s patootie about black knuckleheads hurting the teen mob’s feelings; that’s irrelevant to how this punk acted. And a punk he is, despite his PR firm’s best efforts. His mother initially claimed they were black Muslims (double horror!); tolerance is (or is not) learned at home.

      Like

      • AnonyBob wrote, “the videos still show a smirking privileged white kid in a Trump hat rudely and arrogantly blocking the path of an elderly man”

        You’re a liar.

        It shows a teen doing his best to uncomfortably stand his ground like a man when an annoying elderly man thumping a drum crossed the street from the area where a group of foul mouthed racists were yelling obscenities at the youth and got in his face. The teen was not blocking the elderly man from doing anything, he was standing there and the old man walked up to him – saying he was blocking the old man is a baldfaced lie, there was plenty of space for the elderly man to walk where ever he wanted to go.

        There’s something called Foot-In-Mouth Daily Legal Limit that you should familiarize yourself with, your rapidly approaching your daily limit of 144, but congratulations on only having a short jump to get to a new daily limit of 145.

        Liked by 1 person

        • AnonyBob says:

          Z, you should ease up a bit. I’m no liar any more than you’re a liar for only following RWNJ fake news. Your lax critical thinking skills may make you foolish, but that doesn’t make you a liar. I’m calling it like I (and most people) saw it, even after reviewing various videos. You may not come to the same conclusion. “Stand his ground like a man” also seems to be “plant yourself inches from senior’s face and refuse to move.” This “like a man” ‘tude has led to a lot of idiocy in the world. He was a rude punk who should have let this man by, who was doing nothing to harass these prep school brats.

          Like

        • AnonyBob wrote, “I’m no liar any more than you’re a liar for only following RWNJ fake news.”

          I’m not following any news, I looked at the actual facts and any person that chooses to say the young man is blocking the path of the old man after reviewing the full videos is a liar. Own it.

          AnonyBob wrote, “He was a rude punk who should have let this man by, who was doing nothing to harass these prep school brats.”

          Bull S…!

          The old man intentionally inserted himself into the crowd of teenagers, walked in front of the young man, and stood there thumping his drum; the actions of the old man were harassing the actions of the young man were not. You sir are a morally and ethically bankrupt bigot lying to spin an attack against the youth because you dislike their opinion; that’s morally and ethically bankrupt trolling.

          Like

        • Cornelius Gotchberg says:

          @AnonyBob;

          “I’m calling it like I (and most people) saw it, even after reviewing various videos.”

          List a few then.

          Don’t bother auditing the following: Joy Behar, Dusty Smith, CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC, MSNBC, CBC, NYT, USA Today, WaPo, Chicago Tribune, and, oh yeah, FoxNews, Daily Wire, Breitbart, ad infinitum ad nauseum, because they all say yer full of $#!T.

          I’m with them and the 100’s of others that have PROVEN you’ve just shredded the last iota of credibility you EVER may have had; youse’ve crossed the Rubicon!

          Say; don’t other cultures having certain…um…procedures in place for when individuals bring eternally condemnable shame upon themselves or their families?

          You’ll likely just be censured and provided with daily reminders that youse can never be relied on for anything remotely resembling the truth.

          Count on The Gotch to be one of those doing the reminding!

          Here’s one of ’em:

          ”when Keith Ellison is nominated for a lifetime appointment to the Supreme Court, I’ll see the equivalency your grasping for.”

          The Gotch

          Like

      • Cornelius Gotchberg says:

        ”I don’t give a rat’s patootie about black knuckleheads hurting the teen mob’s feelings”

        THIS JUST IN: @AnonyBob is perfectly fine with hateful, racist, homophobic vitriol**

        **So long as the objects are deemed deserving.

        Yer nothing if not consistent with yer sliding scale (sliding Lefty) of the validity of victim’s accusations, am I right?

        Recall your magnificent decree that some #MeToo victims’ protestations are more equal than others?

        I do!

        To wit:

        Because Keith Ellison wasn’t up for a lifetime position, the accusation of Karen Monahan wasn’t as valid!

        Hypocrisy; thy name is @AnonyBob!

        The Gotch

        Like

        • Batman says:

          ”I don’t give a rat’s patootie about black knuckleheads hurting the teen mob’s feelings”

          “Black knuckleheads”, that’s all you have to say.
          The BHIs did not hurt the teen’s feelings; again, watch more of the videos and listen how the teens interacted with the taunting hate mongers. They were strikingly mature.
          You’re just making shit up.

          bobo, listen carefully to everything the group of hate mongers said and let us know if you still give them a pass.

          Like

        • AnonyBob says:

          I don’t give them a pass, Batty, I don’t give them any significance. They had nothing to do with how Sandmann acted toward Phillips. You guys show your desperation by such a weak deflection.

          Like

        • AnonyBob wrote, “I don’t give them any significance. They had nothing to do with how Sandmann acted toward Phillips.”

          Those statements are solid proof that AnonyBob did not watch the full videos when they were revealed and AnonyBob is just repeating social justice warrior and progressive false attacks.

          AnonyBob is either literally blind, ignorant or a liar; those are the only choices that explain AnonyBob’s attack dog stance.

          Like

      • WashCoRepub says:

        Excellent. The Left has now determined that they require a specific set of expressions on white people’s faces that they deem ‘appropriate.’ Should ‘the white’ display an expression they deem NOT appropriate, the threat of physical violence is then a justified response.

        Perhaps The Left would grant the same opportunity to those of us on the Right, and we can show examples from, say, the Capitol Act 10 protests of some ‘expressions’ of those shown by the protestors, and then we can indicate which ones we will accept/not accept without threatening violence to them or their families? I personally will be especially hard on ‘smirking Blacks’ or ‘smirking Latinas,’ as the goal is to split society by identifying primarily by color, as was Dr. King’s dream, if I’m reading him right?

        Like

    • richard lesiak says:

      you wouldn’t know a Black Hebrew Israelite if he bit you on the arm.

      Like

    • richard lesiak says:

      “cold harsh reality”…you mean like Peterson tearing up the wis. gop attempt to screw with our voting rights. The RWNJ’s are already screaming that he must be some lefty federal judge. Good job judge.

      Like

      • Cornelius Gotchberg says:

        @richard lesiak;

        I’m certain yer not aware, but the adults are having a conversation that’s clearly beyond yer…um…unique skill set.

        Yer abilities would be FAR more appropriate elsewhere.

        The Gotch

        Like

        • AnonyBob says:

          You go, Richard! You go away, Gootch.

          Like

        • richard lesiak says:

          You call it a conversation; I call it the same old gotch gibberish. You righties love to play the victim any chance youse get. And you are all in lock step when you think you have been offended. Watching the Evers speech was a great eye-opener. As he outlined his plans every repub sat on their hands. Heathcare for wis. BOO HISS. Clean water BOO HISS. Education BOO HISS. The only time the gop side got up off their fat a$$es was for his tax cut plan. They are already planning how to block anything he wants to do. I can’t wait for 2020 to clean the rest of the gop out of the capital.

          Like

  3. Tom Paine says:

    Some may, at some time in their life, have questioned how “normal” Germans could have become unthinking, totalitarian ideologues of aggression and genocide. How did this happen?

    AnonyBob, through his defense of the progressive meme, regardless FACTS, provides a contemporary example of “emotional reasoning” that is again demonstrates how ‘normal’ people become dangerous zealots of evil.

    *One source on the radio, which I can’t confirm or deny: –> Kids’ chaperone claims none of them brought MAGA hats to DC. Someone at the demonstration distributed the hats for free, shortly before the Indian (not a Vietnam vet) approached their group. Whole scene was a setup.
    ???

    I remember similar allegations by the Black Congressional Caucus about verbal attacks by Tea Party advocates as they entered the Capitol. Andrew Breitbart “assert[ed] that slurs were never used, and that “it was a set-up” by Nancy Pelosi and the Democratic Party. Breitbart offered to donate $100,000 to the United Negro College Fund “for any audio/video footage of the N-word being hurled,” claiming that the several Congressmen made it up. Breitbart insisted Congressman John Lewis and several other witnesses were forced to lie, concluding that “Nancy Pelosi did a great disservice to a great civil rights icon by thrusting him out there to perform this mischievous task. His reputation is now on the line as a result of her desperation to take down the Tea Party movement.”

    No film and no evidence was ever presented. The U Negro CF did not collect the $100,000

    Like

    • AnonyBob says:

      Those hats didn’t look brand new. I call BS on your whole, vague “radio report.” You know how ordinary, good Germans came to support the Nazis? Scared citizens worried about Jews (all these minorities?) devoted to an authoritarian leader enforced by brown shirt (red hat?) wearing zealots. And yes, I do think anyone proudly wearing a MAGA hat would’ve proudly worn a swastika in an earlier era.
      Breitbart? Good god…you should worry more about your credibility.

      Like

      • Batman says:

        The violence is NOT coming from those wearing MAGA hats bobo, think Antifa.
        More lies from bobo the troll.

        Like

      • Cornelius Gotchberg says:

        @AnonyBob;

        I sincerely hope this pig-headed imbecility is an act.

        @Tom Paine wasn’t citing Breitbart, but explaining that he offered a $100 large reward for A/V proof of what the spoiled Black Congressional Caucus BRATS were claiming.

        The reward was never claimed; guess why?

        Because the spoiled Black Congressional Caucus BRATS lied, knowing full well that White Lefty Guilt-suffocated Lefties like yerself don’t <b<need proof; you’s just know.

        Just like the riveting, yet fact-n-proof bereft testimony of Justice Kavanaugh’s accusers. You’s want to suspend due process and convict with a pointed finger….provided the accused isn’t ideologically certified.

        Someday, and that day likely will never come, were youse to shake off that suffocating obtuseness, you’s see the truth.

        The Gotch

        Like

      • AnonyBob wrote, “yes, I do think anyone proudly wearing a MAGA hat would’ve proudly worn a swastika in an earlier era.”

        That statement is absolute evidence of completely consumed bigotry.

        AnonyBob is openly stating that he’s a morally bankrupt BIGOT and he’s damn proud of it!

        Like

        • AnonyBob wrote, “You righties just refuse to face reality.”

          That’s trolling delivered straight up without a twist and it’s actually quite hilarious coming from a progressive troll that doesn’t have a clue as to what reality is even when it’s placed directly in front of his face. Willful blindness to absolute truth is a trait of all progressives.

          Like

        • Cornelius Gotchberg says:

          @AnonyBob;

          “You righties just refuse to face reality.”

          That reality include Nathan Phillips being a Viet Nam veteran?

          Not exactly.

          Youse have enabled Valor Theft, on top of yer other unconscionable breaches of decorum and the truth.

          It’s now necessary for youse to waddle back in here and issue an appropriately contrite and groveling apology for ignoring the fact-based Universe, yet again, to your hilariously embarrassing peril!

          The Gotch

          Like

        • AnonyBob says:

          Gootch, you should read the things you link to. He is a veteran. He was a Marine. (How did YOU serve, Oh Pompous One?) He served during the Vietnam era, as he stated, but he never was deployed to VN and never claimed to have fought there. Let’s hear your apology for dissing a veteran.

          Like

        • AnonyBob wrote, “Gootch, you should read the things you link to. He is a veteran. He was a Marine. (How did YOU serve, Oh Pompous One?) He served during the Vietnam era, as he stated, but he never was deployed to VN and never claimed to have fought there. Let’s hear your apology for dissing a veteran.”

          #1 and foremost, he did not “diss” a veteran in any way, in fact he didn’t “diss” anyone! Your claim is another lie.

          Also; look up the definition of “diss” you idiot, it doesn’t mean what you think it does and it certainly doesn’t mean stand your ground against someone that has approached you beating a drum in your face.

          #2 Maybe you are as dumb as you project around here; there was news organizations that were openly stating that Phillips was a Vietnam Veteran, directly implying a war veteran. In fact I personally saw it on Fox News, CNN, and ABC. Of course everyone is walking that back now and stating that Phillips is a Vietnam Era Veteran.

          Also; you have falsely implied that Gotch stated that Phillips himself stated that he was a Vietnam Veteran.

          When will you stop lying.

          Like

        • AnonyBob says:

          Hey, Z-Einstein! Gootch accused me, the left, Phillips or someone (Gootch doesn’t write clearly) of “enabling Valor Theft” (eye roll) because assumptions were made that Phillips served in VN, which he never claimed. Well, he is a vet. I think all who served in uniform deserve respect, and certainly don’t deserve chickhawk Gootch’s diss-respect. You don’t agree?

          Like

        • AnonyBob wrote, “Gootch accused me, the left, Phillips or someone (Gootch doesn’t write clearly) of “enabling Valor Theft” (eye roll) because assumptions were made that Phillips served in VN, which he never claimed.”

          You’re a damn fool AnonyBob. “Enabling Valor Theft” is specifically talking about the people that falsely claimed that Phillips was a Vietnam Veteran not that Phillips was a valor thief. If you don’t understand what enabling means or how to use it, and it’s damn clear that you don’t, take a trip to your local High School and have an English teacher explain it to you or maybe attend a Alanon meeting in your area and discuss it there.

          AnonyBob wrote, “Well, he is a vet. I think all who served in uniform deserve respect”

          I agree. No one disrespected Phillips – I repeat no one disrespected Phillips.

          AnonyBob wrote, “certainly don’t deserve chickhawk Gootch’s diss-respect.”

          Again, no one disrespected Phillips including Gotch. If you dare to actually learn what “enabling” means and how to use it you’ll enlighten yourself to a new reality.

          Like

      • madisonexpat says:

        So it wasn’t only a FaceCrime….it was HatCrime.
        Now for two minutes of hate for HatCrime.

        Like

    • Batman says:

      Insightful excellent comment Mr. Paine.

      One oversight in your post however is that bobo trolls all the time and that’s why Batman doesn’t take him seriously and often speaks to him in his own language — trollspeak.
      Pay close attention to the inflammatory nature of his comments and that is an inescapable conclusion. Most of his comments are just taunts.

      For example, calling the teens waiting for their bus a “mob”, and twice now inaccurately stating the Indian dude was prevented from walking forward by the teens when by his own admission he confronted the teens as a peacemaker and wanted to be exactly where he was. And stating the BHIs were just “knuckleheads,” etc. etc. etc.

      Like

  4. Gary L. Kriewald says:

    If some old bastard had walked up to me and started pounding a drum in my face, I’d have clobbered him. (So kudos to the kid for exercising more self-restraint than I could have mustered.) But let’s look at the “larger picture,” as they say: a mob of Black Hebrew Israelites (!), Native Americans, teens in MAGA hats, and aggrieved women of various stripes marching in their Handmaids costumes, all exercising their sacred right of free speech and in the process demeaning and antagonizing one another. If there’s a better microcosm of the state of the nation (thanks to decades of proselytizing by the shills of identity politics), I’d like someone to point it out. And let’s not ignore the miracle of social media that allows us all to be (instant) judges, juries and executioners. Anyone puzzled by the appeal of authoritarianism might do well to study this spectacle.

    Like

  5. Batman says:

    What do the Black Hebrew Israelites, Antifa, and Freedom Inc. have in common?

    Like

    • Cornelius Gotchberg says:

      @Batman;

      Oooh Ohhh, I know I know!!

      They’re all catastrophically clueless/fool-tool/useful idiots of Lefty, am I right?

      The Gotch

      Like

  6. Batman says:

    “I don’t give them a pass, Batty, I don’t give them any significance. They had nothing to do with how Sandmann acted toward Phillips. You guys show your desperation by such a weak deflection.”

    No deflection bobo.
    As more video emerged (that you watched), the hate mongers were clearly the most incendiary ugly part of the entire gathering and your dismissive attitude says a lot about you.
    When called on that you deflect by saying they had nothing to do with Sandmann/Phillips. The Left propaganda MSM decided after the hate mongers video came out to virtually ignore them too because it interfered with their desired narrative.
    Sad…and dangerous.

    Like

  7. madisonexpat says:

    ABob knowingly lies yet again. The boy never moved his feet. The Indian advanced into his space and banged a drum in the boy’s face. I say again, the boy did not move his feet. ABob has him dead wrong then claims ‘nuance’ which is LeftSpeak for ‘I’m now going to willfully misinterpret’.
    ABob also lied about the Charlottesville quote and Brett Kavanaugh’s history, to name a few other evil lies. Why? Because he can go to sleep at night knowing he’s doing a small evil act to serve a larger Lefty good.

    Like

    • AnonyBob says:

      My, my, my, you pay close attention to me. How flattering. Did you teach your kids to stand in the way of an elderly man and not move out of his way? Righties are so…RUDE!
      You may not like how I point things out to you, but that doesn’t make them lies.

      Like

      • Gary L. Kriewald says:

        So all elderly men automatically deserve respect? Keep that in mind when you make your next snarky comment about “old white guys.” His age had nothing to do with it–his intentions are what count, and he clearly intended to confront the schoolkids.

        Like

      • madisonexpat says:

        No Abob, your “pointing”, twisting and torturing plain English doesn’t make your statements lies…. you do. Repeatedly and for the same reason….. hatred, blind hatred.

        Also, since you asked, I taught my 8 year USMC vet daughter that if a a lunatic strides up to challenge her space, gets in her face and wants to make her react to him;
        1) don’t disappoint him
        2) make the response clear.
        Granted I’m far not as good a parent as the father of the young MAGA hat wearer.

        Like

  8. Cornelius Gotchberg says:

    “yes, I do think anyone proudly wearing a MAGA hat would’ve proudly worn a swastika in an earlier era.”

    Yes, I do KNOW that the cowardly Antifa pussies would’ve proudly worn (READ: hidden behind) white robes and pointy hats in an earlier era.

    Wait a minute.

    Weren’t the cowardly pussies that proudly wore white robes and pointy hats in an earlier era ALSO members of the democrat Party?

    Why yes, yes, I believe cowardly pussies that proudly wore white robes and pointy hats in an earlier era WERE also members of the democrat Party!

    History repeats itself yet again!

    The Gotch

    Like

  9. Batman says:

    “Nathan Phillips’s Interview with CNN Is Full of Falsehoods, Inconsistencies, and Nonsense
    By David French, January 22, 2019 7:10 PM”

    One excerpt below from the interview, with analysis and similar quotes in the David French article that provides piercing insight into Phillips thinking, integrity, and motivations.

    CNN: Were you trying to calm the situation down basically when you saw kind of things seemed to spiral out of control?

    Phillips: I think so. I think that was the push, that we need to use the drum, use our prayer and bring a balance, bring a calming to the situation. I didn’t assume that I had any kind of power to do that, but at the same time, I didn’t feel that I could just stand there anymore and not do something. It looked like these young men were going to attack these guys. [the black Hebrew Israelites] They were going to hurt them. They were going to hurt them because they didn’t like the color of their skin. They didn’t like their religious views. They were just here in front of the Lincoln — Lincoln is not my hero, but at the same time, there was this understanding that he brought the (Emancipation Proclamation) or freed the slaves, AND HERE ARE AMERICAN YOUTH WHO ARE READY TO, LOOK LIKE, LYNCH THESE GUYS. TO BE HONEST, THEY LOOKED LIKE THEY WERE GOING TO LYNCH THEM. THEY WERE IN THIS MOB MENTALITY. Where were their parents? Because they were obvious a student group. Where were their– (caps mine)

    https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/nathan-phillips-interview-cnn-falsehoods-inconsistencies/

    Like

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s