If the shirt fits

Patronize someone else!

Democrats still pursue identity politics — aka racism.

As we were saying about phonies, and the spotting thereof, Democrats are determined to dress up their grievance studies graduates in Carhartt and Dickies, the better to gull Dick Loudon’s rustic backwoodsmen — Larry, brother Daryl, and the other brother Daryl — into voting for microwavable socialism and nondenominational drag queen story hour. 

A few thrilling episodes ago, we observed that Rebecca Cooke can trudge through all the low-ceiling, red barns she wants, but the challenger to incumbent U.S. Rep. Derrick Van Orden in western Wisconsin is still a professional Democrat; a paid political gun for hire in four states; endorsed by that New York elitist Zohran Mamdani; frontman for George Soros; rally partner with socialist Bernie Sanders; and pet project of John Nichols of The Nation.

Which rightly frustrates the dwindling number of blue dog Democrats still driving their father’s Oldsmobile. The Liberal Patriot, that cohort’s avatar, outs the current crop’s most visible candidates as “Democrats’ return to Walz-ism.

“Farm livin’ is the life for me!’🎵

False advertising

Since installing tampon dispensers in the boys room, Governor Walz gave away the taxpayers’ store to an immigrant voting bloc scamming as hallowed victims, then urged citizen resistance to the nation’s immigration laws. (An insurrection of a kind.) Kamala Harris’ choice of a running mate, the Liberal Patriot’s Michael Baharaeen writes

was predicated on little more than identity politics: the idea that white working-class voters will be reassured by having someone who looks like them. … that most voters need to identify with a candidate’s race or gender to consider voting for them.

That, the author writes, “comes off as quite patronizing.” Quite!

The nation’s two highest-profile phonies, The Liberal Patriot posits, are James Talarico in Texas and Graham Platner in Maine, both running against Republican senators. Platner “looks on the surface like he was designed in a lab to win over working-class voters. He is a burly, blue-collar figure from a small Maine town whose résumé includes military service and a career as an oyster farmer.” Never mind that the candidate’s grandfather was a celebrated Manhattan architect, his father a lawyer, and the candidate himself the graduate of a toney private boarding school. An Oliver Wendell Douglas on Green Acres.

Talarico and Platner engage in what The Liberal Patriot calls “cultural denialism — dismissing cultural issues — and thus voters’ concerns about them — for not being ‘real issues.’ Platner, for example, dismisses cultural issues saying ‘Every single breath we take discussing culture war stuff is a breath we are not talking about universal healthcare.’”

Take your guilt and …

We interrupt this diatribe for this news bulletin: middle America is not pining for universal health care, broad band, or subsidized daycare — just fill the potholes. They don’t hate the rich — they’d like to become so, themselves. Their ancestors filled out all the immigration forms. When a neighbor goes down, they help with his harvest. They pick up after themselves and stop at the stop sign when no one is around. Policing does not need to be “re-imagined.” Flyover country has enough pronouns, pays too much tax, works for what they’ve got, held no slaves, are sorry about the Indians and wish them well.

Blaska’s Bottom Line: Many of our candidates for local office here in Madison and Dane County are wearing their Carhartt and Dickies fresh off the rack, hoping you won’t notice the price tag.

Can you tell the difference?

Keep responses to fewer than 250 words; no images

4 responses to “Patronize someone else!”

  1. pioneering609d4d5a89 Avatar
    pioneering609d4d5a89

    Sounds like you are trying to put Duluth Trading Co. out of Business. As I walked thought the outlet in Mount Horeb last weekend my intuition told me 75% of the shoppers were looking to find something to wear to the next NO KING Protest on the square. Ole and Lena thought the DFL party was a bunch of pig farmers, sometimes it seems that honest people always get side swiped by a weasel like Walz or even Evers or Mamdani. That is why some of us like Trump even with all his peculiarities.

  2. Alex Avatar
    Alex

    Dave, your flyover country catechism is stirring stuff. But you whiffed on the health care bit, and FOX 6 Milwaukee caught you. Not MSNBC. Not The Nation. FOX.
    Pew Research surveyed 10,357 adults. Two-thirds of them, 66%, say the federal government should ensure health care coverage for all citizens. That’s not a Madison focus group, Dave. That’s America.

    Here’s the kicker you’ll want to fold into your Carhartt: 41% of Republicans say the same thing. That’s nine points higher than in 2021. The number climbs to 60% among lower-income Republicans. You know, the Larry-Daryl-and-the-other-Daryl contingent you were just invoking.

    Only 7% of respondents say the federal government should provide no health insurance at all. Seven percent. Blaska’s base, apparently.

    Now, Americans are split on how. Single-payer versus a public-private mix. That’s a legitimate debate. Graham Platner can hash it out with Van Orden. But the idea that working-class voters don’t want the government involved in their health care? That’s not a data point. That’s a bumper sticker.

    Blaska’s Bottom Line: You can dress up in rhetorical Dickies all you want. But when FOX News is running Pew data showing 66% of Americans want government-guaranteed health care, maybe it’s time to update the sermon. The congregation has moved on.

    https://www.fox6now.com/news/two-thirds-americans-believe-government-should-ensure-health-care-all-poll

    1. David Blaska Avatar

      My understanding of “universal” health care, the term I used, is the Bernie Sanders model of single-payer, government supported. Gallup found this: On “public support for a government-run U.S. healthcare system, such as those in Canada & the United Kingdom … 46% saying the U.S. should have a government-run healthcare system, while 49% are in favor of a system based mostly on private health insurance.” But I take your point.

      1. Alex Avatar
        Alex

        Dave, your Gallup catch was fair, and I should have been more precise about what poll I was citing. But I’d push back on the framing we were both using.

        Bernie Sanders doesn’t get to define “universal health care.” The WHO does. And their definition has nothing to do with single-payer. Universal health care means every resident can access health services without financial hardship. The mechanism, whether single-payer, regulated private insurance, or a public option, is a separate question entirely.

        Germany has universal health care through regulated private insurers. Switzerland has it through individual mandates. Canada has it through a single payer. All three qualify. None of them is identical.

        So when your column said middle America isn’t pining for universal health care, you were using “universal” as shorthand for “Bernie’s model.” That’s the most politically radioactive version of the concept, and it still polls at 46%. The underlying goal, everybody covered, and nobody wiped out by a hospital bill, polls at 66%. Those aren’t the same question.

        Platner isn’t wrong that voters care about this. He may be wrong about the mechanism they’d accept. That’s the debate worth having.

        Blaska’s Bottom Line: You read Gallup right. But Bernie doesn’t own the dictionary, and neither do we.

Leave a Reply to David BlaskaCancel reply

Discover more from Blaska Policy Werkes

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading