Democrats circling the wagons on Hillary’s insurrection

Remember impeachment witness Fiona Hill?
She was in on it!

Hillary Clinton and the Democrat(ic) party weaponized the Federal Bureau of Investigation to overthrow a democratically elected President. With the connivance of a corrupt news media and party operatives like Adam Schiff they brought the Russian Collusion Hoax to the brink of impeachment. Only when that fizzled did Democrats substitute a phone call to Ukraine. We know of no other interpretation of special prosecutor John Durham’s findings to date. And there’s more to come!

Law professor Jonathan Turley is connecting the dots. We excerpt from two of his recent posts. They are must reads:

It is clear from the latest indictment why leading Democrats like Chuck Schumer tried to kill the Durham investigation. None of that however prepared some of us for the response of MSNBC’s Rachel Maddow, who called upon fired FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok to question the indictments. Strzok was fired at the recommendation of career investigators and has been cited as an example of the raw bias of key players in the Russian investigation. Yet, he was the choice of MSNBC to review the recent indictments and he did not disappoint in belittling the crimes alleged by the special counsel.

Maddow was one of the leading voices pushing the Russian collusion claims. She has not corrected her past statements or apologized for pushing the discredited claims.

scary clown in gutter

On July 28, former CIA Director John Brennan briefed then President Obama on Hillary Clinton’s alleged “plan” to tie Donald Trump to Russia as “a means of distracting the public from her use of a private email server.” Notes from the meeting state the plan to invent a collusion narrative was “allegedly approved by Hillary Clinton a proposal from one of her foreign policy advisers to vilify Donald Trump by stirring up a scandal claiming interference by the Russian security service.” That was three days before the Russian investigation was initiated. … (Read & Weep.)

Think tank was operations center

The latest indicted figure, Danchenko, worked at the Brookings [Institution] … proved to be the key unnamed source for Christopher Steele and later admitted to the FBI that the information attributed to him was not just “unsubstantiated” but, after being reworked by Steele, was unrecognizable from the original gossip or speculation. … It appears that Danchenko was introduced to former British spy Christopher Steele by Brookings employee Fiona Hill. … Hill secured a position on President Trump’s National Security Council and later became a key witness against him in the first Trump impeachment over the Ukraine scandal. …

Fiona Hill

Steele also testified in London that his friend and then Brookings president Strobe Talbott was involved in briefings and inquiries on the development of the dossier. Talbott is also a former Clinton administration diplomat and Clinton friend. (Read & weep.)

Blaska’s Bottom Line: Hillary’s attempted insurrection will make Watergate look like a Wisconsin Dells amusement ride.

When will James Comey be indicted?

About David Blaska

Madison WI
This entry was posted in Donald Trump, Impeachment and tagged , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Democrats circling the wagons on Hillary’s insurrection

  1. AdamC says:

    Were Branden and/or Obama involved too?

    Well at least Creepy Joe might be able to honestly reply, “I don’t recall.”


    • Liberty says:

      Good one, Adam.

      What a sad statement on our country that someone in such obvious cognitive decline is the leader of the free world. And leftists are still defending him.


      • Gary L. Kriewald says:

        Of course they’re still defending him. Why shouldn’t they? He’s doing exactly what they want him to do–or rather being exactly what they want him to be: a cardboard-cutout who mouths whatever talking points he’s given by the radical leftist cabal who have been the ones in charge of the country for the past 10 months. Remember the “moderate” candidate who pledged to save us from the “radical” agenda of Trump? He played that role to perfection as well.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Liberty says:

    This whole thing makes me sick to my stomach.

    The subversion of our government & weaponizing of its agencies. The giddiness & arrogance of leftist media outlets eager to promote lies and half truths. The stupidity of leftists who still believe this unsubstantiated nonsense on blind faith, because Rachel Maddow or some other idiot on MSNBC or CNN said it’s true.

    The truth needs to come out and people need to be held accountable. Our country can’t survive any other way.

    Seems though that the truth & justice seekers are outnumbered by the disgusting, corrupt, broken people plaguing our government. So getting to that truth and finding that justice is an uphill battle.

    It’s truly in God’ hands.


    • AdamC says:

      The silence of the media, and so-called lovers of truth and justice, about this matter — as well as randen’s demented incompetence and abject failure — is deafening.

      The ONLY thing that will work is a huge midterm rebuke of this corruption and incompetence in 2022, and defeating Branden in 2024 as well as sealing additional congressional majorities for the GOP too.

      The GOP better wake up and realize it’s time NOW to prepare to undo and fix everything Branden and the commies running the show have done to try to wreck America.


  3. Never trusted Fiona Hill from the get go. She was nothing more than a dark-haired Dr. Blasey Ford. Plants.


Comments are closed.