Is he trying to advance his Woke-ism?
Maybe it’s cyber hacking or just a cruel prank. But we have new evidence our progressive … acquaintances really are that clueless. The Sunday New York Times (we read it for the funny pages) features an advice column called “The Ethicist.” It’s Dear Abby for the guilty Woke.
Today’s question: “As a white man, can I date women of color to advance my anti-racism?”
I’m a straight white dude and recent college grad who has very progressive beliefs. … A woman of color … checks a box for me. I am seeking to be anti-racist in all my relationships. … To combat implicit bias, having grown up in a fairly white, quasi-rural place, I am dedicated to educating myself on issues of racism, sexism, and other forms of kyriarchy while also learning from marginalized people.” — Name Withheld
The Ethicist reveals that “kyriarchy’” is Woke-talk meaning “to designate inter-connected systems of domination on the basis of gender, race, religion, and other identities.” The Ethicist then launches into an equivocal disquisition that never lands anywhere. The irascible Head Groundskeeper is more succinct: Name Withheld, you need a good swift kick in the cojones. Then give Elon Musk directions to that college from which you recently graduated.
Can’t you save a baby seal, instead?
Name Withheld (who can blame him) wants reassurance when he asks, “Is [his request] somehow itself racist?”
No Name, there’s no “somehow’ about it. It is the very definition of racism! You are a self-centered, virtue-signaling, holier-than-thou buzz kill. You don’t want diversity. You want affirmation for your good deed. An invite to Joy Reid’s show. (Better hurry!) For using some innocent black woman to expiate your learned white guilt.
There it is! Our brief against critical race theory and the whole DEI industrial complex, in one tragi-comic question! Your self-righteous guilt-mongering elected Donald Trump/JD Vance. You teed up their TV ad of Kamala promising the burly woman that Democrats were on board with dunning taxpayers to dress illegal immigrant fentanyl dealers in pearls and taffeta.
Hurry, Name Withheld, because MSNBC is canceling Joy Reid! “The network’s decision comes after years of Reid’s peddling far-left narratives involving identity politics and progressive ideologies,” National Review reports. It’s not censorship; the free market works wonders to behold. Her show lost half its viewers since the November election, when Wokeness lost half of America.
It is why the new commander in chief is sacking DEI generals and admirals. It is why Jill Underly, Wisconsin’s head school marm, received only 37% of the vote in a three-way primary. Because she submerged our public schools in Project 1619 critical race theory, not English comp.
‘So stupid it hurts’ says Eric Hovde
about Tony Evers after the Democrat mis-governing the State of Wisconsin reverted to his native Woke-speak when he crossed out from legislation the good, understandable English “mother” and replaced it with “inseminated person” and “parent who gave birth to the child.” (More here.) The Governor Person and former inseminator is a former boss of public instruction.
6 responses to “Our governor is goofier than Joy Reid”
And this is why Democrats will never win another election thank God!
Ichabod Evers likely noted Guvvy Gavvy getting positively b!tchslapped by the Tranny Industrial Complex after slobbering this pro-infanticide statement: If Men Could GET PREGNANT This Wouldn’t Even Be A Conversation
It gets worse (if you’re a despicable Lefty)
James Carville Blasts Progressive Ideas As “Stunningly Stupid” In Fiery Critique
MONEY QUOTE: “It’s like there’s a plant somewhere in ‘progressive’ America that sees how many jackass stupid things they can embrace. It’s stunningly stupid.”
Thinks Carville’s onto something? The Gotch sure does!
The gotch
It speaks volumes that Name Withheld looks at another human being and sees an entity whose sole purpose is to “check a box FOR ME.” As for the miserable old scarecrow in the governor’s office: his Orwellian nomenclature tells you everything you need to know about his worldview–you know, the one that got the s**t kicked out of it in the November election. It’s the same mindset that thinks it’s OK to use a plural pronoun to refer to a singular antecedent, the basic grammar rule that used to be taught in public schools before teachers with pink hair and nose-rings decided that what their pupils really needed was to be subjected to the wisdom of the 1619 Project.
Aren’t they all just pink inside?
Even the Babylon Bee can’t make this stuff up. Name Withheld needs serious help. No self-respecting person would allow themselves to be used as a tool to stroke someone else’s warped sense of self-righteousness. It’s scary to think that there are many more people out there with similar views and that at least some of them have produced offspring.
Hopefully, this blatant endorsement of wokeness causes the NYT to continue to bleed readership and further reduce it to an object of ridicule among real journalists. Then again, most people don’t read the NYT to be informed. They read it to have their beliefs confirmed.
“Name Withheld needs serious help.”
Ya think? Honestly, how does someone fall that far into complete LaLaLoopyLoonyLeftyLand Lunacy? Over @Ethics Alarms, Jack Marshall appropriately calls it The Great Stupid
“Then again, most people don’t read the NYT to be informed. They read it to have their beliefs confirmed.”
Then again, there are those who wouldn’t even use it to wrap fish…because it’s an insult to the fish.
The Gotch