Alder agrees: ‘Burn this F-ing City down’ is “outrageous.”
Tag Evers is no Republican. By profession he is a concert promoter. Currently in his fourth term as a City of Madison alder. Represents the affluent and very progressive Monroe/Dudgeon/Nakoma/Vilas/Regent neighborhoods on Madison’s near West side.
Nice guy. Once asked me to sit down for coffee with him to discuss his idea for a guaranteed living wage, if that gives you an idea. Can pick him out; grizzled guy always wears a stylish chapeau. Great first name! (Tag, you are IT!)
Did I say Tag Evers is no Republican? He posted this on his official City of Madison website this week and e-mailed to constituents:
Hi Everyone,
This morning I received a thoughtful e-mail from a constituent. I’m sharing portions of it below. I strongly concur.
The threat to “burn this f*cking city down” by a city employee is outrageous and literally inflammatory. What followed is not surprising, the setting of five dumpster fires and threats to burn down entire buildings.
The escalatory rhetoric must stop. It’s gone too far and is not productive, but rather spurs conduct that no longer in any way resembles protected speech and non-violent civil disobedience. — Ald. Tag Evers
Here is the e-mail Ald. Evers is sharing (our emphases):
I’m writing as a Madison resident, though of course not one who lives in the Marquette neighborhood. I am someone who believes what has happened there over the past few weeks is indicative of a citywide problem, and I’m deeply frustrated. …
The shooting of Corey Ruiz is a tragedy, however, the circumstances make it deeply complicated and require a serious, fact-based investigation. That investigation should happen, in full.
I’m also frustrated by the conduct of some elected officials on the Council who have, in my view, continued to stoke this situation rather than push for de-escalation —lending legitimacy to a narrative about the shooting that presumes an outcome well before any real investigation has concluded.
But my central concern is with the Office of the Independent Monitor, specifically Aeiramique Glass. The city pays her roughly $150,000 a year to provide police oversight. What I’ve observed over the past several months instead is an official who has repeatedly positioned herself as an adversary of the Council and city leadership: releasing a 31-page memo in April attacking alders and the city attorney, threatening to sue the city, and telling the Council directly that she didn’t believe she could work with them.
This week, drone footage released by MPD appears to show her in a physical altercation with an officer following efforts to clear the encampment, and a separate video shows her afterward, with an injured hand, saying she will “f*cking burn this city down.” That is not the conduct of a neutral overseer. It’s the conduct of an activist, and I don’t believe the city should be funding activism with taxpayer dollars, especially when it actively interferes with police operations during an already volatile moment. No public employee should be allowed to keep their job after a declaration like this.
To be clear, I support real police oversight. What I don’t support is an oversight office run by someone who appears to have already reached conclusions about a complex shooting and is using a taxpayer-funded platform to pursue them. Ms. Glass, or anyone else, is free to peacefully advocate for causes they believe in however they want, but not on the city’s payroll. The Council’s decision this week to withdraw the proposed reporting requirement amendments for the Office of the Independent Monitor — apparently after pressure from the very oversight board that hired her —does not give me confidence that anyone with real authority is willing to hold this office accountable.
In writing today, I express my hope that you will advocate for three things:
1. A serious, professional, and genuinely independent investigation into the shooting itself, one insulated from the current political theater.
2. A formal review of Ms. Glass’s conduct, including this week’s incidents, with real consequences if warranted, up to and including removal from her position.
3. Reintroduction of the transparency and reporting requirements pulled from this week’s agenda, so this office actually answers to someone.
The city needs a real reckoning with how these past few weeks were handled, not just the shooting, but the prolonged disruption to Marquette residents and the conduct of the people entrusted with parts of the response, including the Independent Monitor’s office. I hope you’ll pursue that.
→ BLM/Antifa/Hong socialists plan to “Take Back Willy Street” at 9 tonight 08-06-26
Blaska’s Bottom Line: When you’ve lost Tag Evers, we’re guessing, you’ve lost the Council.
9 responses to “Madison progressive alder calls police monitor behavior ‘outrageous’”
I’m reminded of Derek Sivers’ Ted Talk “How to start a movement”. Tag seems to be the one crazy guy dancing on the hill. The key will be the 2nd person that joins him.
Who will that be?
Get that person and it snowballs from there. See also: “Preference Cascade”.
Wow – a balanced approach – who knew?
“The city pays her [Aromatique Glass] roughly $150,000 a year ….” I’ve heard it’s considerably more than this. And for doing what, exactly? Her job is as redundant as [fill in the blank]. That said, I have a hard time imagining the city of Madison firing a black woman, especially one who squeals as loudly as she does at any perceived slight, no matter her level of incompetency or uselessness.
I’m no longer a rez, but a friend in Madison had the salary of 120,000 a year…which is still far too much for her clownship.
If I was still living in town I’d certainly push for her dismissal.
I keep hearing Ms. Glass referred to “interim police monitor”. I just hope the city hasn’t given her a 5 year contract yet and maybe get rid of her without becoming a Eugene Parks case again.
The mayor called Aeiramique’s behavior disturbing. What has to happen to call it egregious? Your mayor is not rational! That seems to be a thing in Madison. Tag could start by calling for a no confidence vote of SRC. I live in Titletown and the mayor here has internal problems but not to the degree Madison does. I used to visit years ago but Madison no longer is an appealing place to visit. It is hard to comprehend how the Capitol of Wisconsin was allowed to devolve into it’s current state.
I suspect the problem goes beyond this one deranged individual police monitor. The phrase “independent monitor” goes to the heart of the matter. Independence is only one required quality in this monitor. Competent and trained ought to be another. That is, a requirement that the monitor have real hands-on expertise in police matters. However, here’s the rub in making this a requirement. It would mean accepting policing itself as a legitimate professional expertise, and Madison radicals I suspect think policing itself is in its essence illegitimate. Hence, what they want is not an INDEPENDENT monitor, they want an inherently and militantly ADVERSARIAL monitor. Hence, you get their perfect person in Ms Glass.
Today’s news feeds reported the connection between the demonstrators and their source of funding – it was the usual suspects, of course. They need their tax-exempt status revoked, at a bare minimum.
only in MAD TOWN, only in MAD TOWN.