Blaska Policy Werkes

David Blaska, going out of his way to provoke progressives in Madison WI to make America safe for democracy!


Progressives banished our butter maiden

Keep your identity politics off my plate!

Another insensitive American tradition, trashed

Any good conservative blogge (and the one you are reading is good to the last drop) is hair-triggered to express outrage at the merest hint of touchy feely. (Looking at you, Joe Biden). Put another way, we were surreptitiously reading Mad magazine (R.I.P. Mort Drucker) during civics class. We laughed all the way through Terms of Endearment. We drink your milkshake and light our cigars off your votive candles.

“Let God sort ’em out” is our motto.

Which is a windy prologue to announcing that the survivalists at Blaska Experimental Work Farm are tire-biting mad (as Ed Anger would say over at the Weekly World News) over another assault on good-ol’ American hubris.

After nearly a century, Land O’Lakes is quietly removing the Indian maiden from its butter packaging. You read that right. “Multiple sources” report this sad news so it must be true. Damn and double damn!

Land o Lakes

A fine lady with the remarkable name of Lisa Bingenheimer (we s * * * you not) informs her social media friends:

My dad used to alter the box to make it look like the Indian lady’s boobs were under the box of butter … I may have to buy a box before things change just to show my offspring!

Now there is lady who was brought up right! We tip our tattered MAGA caps to Big Daddy Bingenheimer for transmitting solid American values. Well do we remember the cute college co-ed (as the female scholars were known back in the day) deftly working her scissors and, with a strategic bend and fold, initiating the young author of this turgid screed in the secrets of Land O’ Lakes butter. (Folks, if you’re still  not getting it, click here. MUST BE 18! NOT SUITABLE FOR PROGRESSIVES!)

Blaska Rant paragraphs:

⇒ Will “woke” progressives never rest until they’ve uprooted the very foundation of American culture? Spare us your hissy fits, you liberal wonkers! How is this fine, lovely Indian maiden a slur on ethnic womanhood? Isn’t it enough you got Sacagawea on a dollar coin? (How did that work out?) Renamed Squaw Bay in Monona WI? Referred to it as “that NFL team in Washington?”

⇒ What’s next? Will Notre Dame’s “Fighting Irish” be renamed the “Peaceful Pajama Persons”? 

Is nothing sacred profane?

A publication with the suspiciously progressive-sounding name of “Minnesota Reformer” broke the butter maiden story. It quotes a professor at an Ivy League college who expresses satisfaction that “there’s now going to be an entire generation of folks that are growing up without having to see that every time they walk in the grocery store.” Now on to curing the coronavirus!

Never mind that the Indian maiden has adorned the box of butter since 1928, or that it was redesigned in the 1950s by “a highly-successful Ojibwe artist from Red Lake” who wanted to “foster a sense of Indian pride” across the Midwest.

Butter is slavery! 

Blaska’s Bottom Line: Another generation of snowflakes made safe from micro-aggression. Now on to freeing cows from their bondage to humans and their milking “machines.”

Who butters YOUR toast?

45 responses to “Progressives banished our butter maiden”

  1. Dave wrote, “After nearly a century, Land O’Lakes is quietly removing the Indian maiden from its butter packaging.”

    Stupid: Having or showing a great lack of intelligence or common sense.

    Being stupid is becoming way to popular in our society. This story is another example of stupid people hammering another nail into the edges of the coffin and sealing logic and critical thinking away before it’s permanently buried in the quaint anecdotes of history.

    It seems to me that there are people out there that spend every waking moment of their day in search of things they can twist into being offending.

    Is there some new degree offered in colleges across the United States that fully indoctrinates college students and teaches them how to do this?

    Is there some special job market out there that I don’t know about that’s paying a hefty salary for the “skill” of being perpetually offended?

    Do large corporations now have a department full of perpetually offended social justice warriors that advise the board of directors what to do to avoid being condemned by irrational social justice warriors?

    Seriously folks; what the hell is going on?

    I really can’t say this enough…

    These are choices and these kinds of choices are being made for the same kinds of reasons every day all across the United States. It’s there in the news, it’s there in the newspapers, it’s there on the streets, it’s in the school systems, it’s in the police departments, it’s in the government, it’s in the businesses, it’s in the store fronts and it’s in the home – all you have to do is pay attention. The choice is a preemptive one to protect businesses and individuals from the irrational emotional perceptions of morally bankrupt stupid people that use their blind ignorance to destroy others and it matter not how illogical, irrational, emotional and morally bankrupt their justifications are; they have shown that it’s a power they will wield and our society is making decisions based on that fact. These “stupid people” know that there is no way to publicly defend against hordes of virtue signaling people screaming RACIST at the top of their lungs in the physical or virtual public square, even if they’re wrong you can’t prove you’re not a racist it’s trying to prove a negative.

    I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again, progressives and social justice warriors have already won the battle of the minds; either a vast majority of the population is willfully consumed by the social justice bull shit or they are in literal fear of it; therefore, our society is screwed. Progressives’ social justice intimidation tactics have won the day.

    Until “we the people” stand up against this irrational social justice nonsense and say NO MORE the overall intelligence of our society will continue to teeter precariously over the precipice of sanity until it teeters too far and falls directly into the abyss of utter stupidity.

    Apathy Fertilizes A Breeding Ground For Stupidity

    When are we as a society going to bust the hell out of the coffin that social justice warriors are nailing logic and critical thinking inside of and put a stop to this absurd spiral towards the abyss of stupidity?

    Liked by 2 people

    1. ”It seems to me that there are people out there that spend every waking moment of their day in search of things they can twist into being offending.”

      That’s Lefty’s freakin’ raison d’être, Steve.

      Doesn’t surprise The Gotch one whit; the pitiably pathetic empty lives Lefties (most, not all) lead leaves them no alternative.

      #Sad!

      The Gotch

      Liked by 1 person

  2. Will Land O’ Lakes (a lovely little hamlet on the WESconsin (Vilas County) Michigan U.P. state line whose claim to fame is being the source of the mighty Wisconsin River) be forced to find a new handle?

    Stranger things have happened; recall the suffocating morons, I mean WOKE students, at Lebanon [PA] Valley College who demanded the college rename ‘Lynch Memorial Hall,’ named for Dr. Clyde A. Lynch, the LVC’s president during the Depression”?

    Then President Obama’s AG Loretta LYNCH must have been issued a pass…

    Ah Lefty; so MUCH crushing ignominy, so little time!

    The Gotch

    Like

  3. Marge Bils

    Obviously the perpetually offended don’t know the history of the Indian maiden. But what else is new.

    Like

  4. AnonyBob

    Of all the things to get SO worked up about…
    A corporation’s marketing department decides to ditch an “Indian maiden” stereotype straight out of a 1950’s Hollywood Western. Now who’s the perpetually offended? Irony is dead.

    Like

    1. AnonyBob

      Maybe you all also haven’t noticed Aunt Jemima ditched the minstrel show mammy imagery. The times, they are a changing.

      Like

    2. AnonyBob,
      I see you’re back to your spewing out your typical nonsense.

      AnonyBob wrote, “Now who’s the perpetually offended?”

      Offended: Resentful or annoyed, typically as a result of a perceived insult.

      Social justice warriors (SJW’s) are the ones who are “perpetually offended” and public fear of these irrational perpetually offended social justice warriors (aka social justice thugs) is enable the SJW’s to drag our society into the abyss of utter stupidity. Those that look at what the social justice thugs are doing to our society aren’t “offended” in the slightest, we’re just pissed off at the utter stupidity and the blind enabling that allows them to drag our society down the swirling drain.

      AnonyBob wrote, “Irony is dead.”

      If you understood irony properly in this context you wouldn’t/shouldn’t have written that.

      Like

  5. “Social Justice Thugs” – Perfect!

    Liked by 1 person

  6. georgessson

    Yepper A-Bob, Whatta typical superficial reply to a virulent “trend” in society today. That trend is that 2 people get offended and suddenly pleasant images disappear. Good going, The Bob-Meister. yer “Banality” score leaps higher each day. Sorry, but I think yer brains are in yer feet. Maybe some warmer socks needed as we’re still inna throes of 25 degree nights…

    Liked by 1 person

  7. You are so easily manipulated!!! Mr. “Bluster” Blaska assumes someone was offended, or that someone protested, or that someone was being politically correct. So the perpetually offended were easily duped and sucked in again by another manufactured outrage.

    No one in the article suggested there was any movement or pressure to change the packaging. NONE!!! And yet that’s what Blaska wanted you to think. Nice.

    What Blaska didn’t mention…the Land O Lakes (capitalism in action) decision had nothing to do with native American mascots. Just to be clear, do you have something against farmers?:

    “We need packaging that reflects the foundation and heart of our company culture — and nothing does that better than our farmer-owners whose milk is used to produce Land O’Lakes’ dairy products,’ President and CEO Beth Ford said in a statement in February.”

    Or how about the son of the artist who created the logo:

    “Robert DesJarlait, the artist’s son, says he’s glad Land O’Lakes removed the Indian maiden his father helped create but also continues to be proud of his father’s legacy, which includes creating the Hamm’s Beer bear and being one of the first Native modernist painters.”

    Still, no one here can feel any dumber for falling for this trash, than they already are.

    Like

    1. There’s angrier progressives in Madison than Peterson but not by much. Or more naive. Who else would expect the co-op to admit they were being pressured? Notice, no farmer portrayed on new package. Just an empty lake. Maybe because of coronavirus.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. So…”Farmer-Owned” at the top of the package name isn’t a dead giveaway? No farmer huh? Gee, what they don’t admit must then mean they’re hiding something. Pretzel logic.

        Like

    2. Mr Peterson,
      If you serious believe that what the company did has nothing whatsoever to do with being politically correct then you’re actively choosing to be ignorant of what is going on in our society.

      What’s a lot more likely than you actually believing the nonsense you wrote is that you’re trolling.

      Like

      1. You must know exactly what they were thinking to stand so steadfastly behind your fantasy, Gee, you guys are a bunch of stable geniuses after all.

        Like

        1. Cornelius Gotchberg

          A career Lefty swallowing whole some pretty bold-faced Gosh We’re Nice corporate spin?

          The shark has officially been jumped!

          ¡Con mucho cuidado! The 77 Square Miles Surrounded by A Sea Of Reality doesn’t handle well Lefties leaving the Lefty Plantation, where ALL is viewed through the reality-filtering lenses of Industrial-Strength-Hardened-Weapons-Grade-Thickened ideological blinders.

          This may require a stint in the Reeducation Gulag….

          The Gotch

          Liked by 1 person

        2. John Peterson wrote, “You must know exactly what they were thinking to stand so steadfastly behind your fantasy, Gee, you guys are a bunch of stable geniuses after all.”

          Thanks for showing us how a foolish person doubles down on trolling with an ad hominem. You have earned yourself this coveted Gotch Academy Participation Certificate as evidence of your valued participation in this conversation.

          Please take a couple of minutes out of your trolling schedule and read my comment from April 17, 2020 at 10:15 am, it’s at the top of this thread.

          Liked by 1 person

        3. Cornelius Gotchberg

          Ooooh…coveted Gotchie!

          A welcome addition to ANY wafer thin résumé, am I right?

          The Gotch

          Liked by 1 person

      2. Was your snow flake righty safe place disturbed by the supposed “trolling with an ad hominem.” So the following is NOT ad hominem… “Lefties leaving the Lefty Plantation, where ALL is viewed through the reality-filtering lenses of Industrial-Strength-Hardened-Weapons-Grade-Thickened ideological blinders.” Thanks for the empty award bestowing upon me all the rights that defines right-wing victimhood. By the way, believing something you can’t prove but can only assume, just to sell your radical point of view, is an admission of weakness.

        Like

        1. Cornelius Gotchberg

          ”So the following is NOT ad hominem…”

          Nope; merely accurate, fact-based conclusions derived from decades of objective observations in the field.

          And The Gotch would like to personally recognize the selfless effort you cranked out in order to qualify for his eponymous award.

          Its receipt does come with a free subscription to our GFY newsletter.

          How many can we put you down for…?

          The Gotch

          Like

        2. John Peterson wrote, “Was your snow flake righty safe place disturbed by the supposed “trolling with an ad hominem.” So the following is NOT ad hominem… “Lefties leaving the Lefty Plantation, where ALL is viewed through the reality-filtering lenses of Industrial-Strength-Hardened-Weapons-Grade-Thickened ideological blinders.” “

          That was a rationalization and a deflection.

          John Peterson wrote,“Thanks for the empty award bestowing upon me all the rights that defines right-wing victimhood.”

          That’s frontier gibberish.

          John Peterson wrote,“By the way, believing something you can’t prove but can only assume, just to sell your radical point of view, is an admission of weakness.”

          You mean like all the nonsense you wrote, are you really the hypocrite you just portrayed yourself to be?

          Listen troll; your rationalizations, deflections, frontier gibberish, and hypocrisy will get you no where with me. How about you scroll up to the top of this comment thread, read that comment of mine dated April 17, 2020 at 10:15 am and let’s see if you have the intellectual fortitude to engage in a real discussion about what I wrote or if all you have is attack the messenger BS. The choice is yours to prove that you either are or are not a troll.

          Troll: Those that post inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages in an online community with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion, often for their own amusement.

          Like

  8. georgessson

    David relates -A fine lady with the remarkable name of Lisa Bingenheimer (we s * * * you not) informs her social media friends:

    “My dad used to alter the box to make it look like the Indian lady’s boobs were under the box of butter … I may have to buy a box before things change just to show my offspring!”

    So…. I saved the box image and will have some juvenile fun w/ it in Photoshop, adhering to the guidelines set out above. Pr’oly a GOOD thing that we cannot post images here…

    Covid-19 “boredom relief” takes many a sharp turn these days….

    Like

  9. madisonexpat

    Hey ABob, do you find Tara Reade credible. NB: she’s a woman.

    Like

    1. AnonyBob

      Credible? Not really. Her story keeps changing and no one else has come forward with a similar accusation, unlike the 19 women who filed suit against our self-admitted (even bragged about it!) Pussy-Grabber-in-Chief. Is this really a discussion you right wing blowhards want to have?

      Like

      1. Cornelius Gotchberg

        “Credible? Not really. Her story keeps changing”

        Um…expat was referring to Tara Reade, NOT Christina Blasey-Ford, who, if memory serves, you chose to defend to the death.

        How’d that turn out?

        “no one else has come forward with a SIMILAR accusation” (bold/cap mine)

        Kinda weasel-worded even for a career Lefty, but these are desperate times for a democrat Party that has hilariously painted themselves into a corner by hitching its wagon to the #MeToo star, am I right?

        Hillarity Clinton even ill-advisedly stuck her toe in the water, more than once, and promptly got it blown to smithereens.

        To wit:

        Hillary Clinton @HillaryClinton. Nov 22, 2015
        Every survivor of sexual assault deserves to be heard, believed, and supported. http://hrc.io/SexualAssault

        Oh the deeply viscid irony through which she must have slogged mightily through to post that. And how could she have possibly known about Lefty Mega-Donor Harvey Pervstein when she didn’t even know about her co-President, the Former Serial Sexual Predator In Chief, am I right?

        Anywho, back to Dementia Joe:

        ALL THE WOMEN Who Have Spoken Out Against Joe Biden

        No doubt there’s more, and it’s not outside the realm of possibility that Quid Pro Joe called in a few favors from the Clintonista Silencing Squad.

        Limit yourself to echo-chamber clatter, and you run the very real risk of finding yourself on the wrong side of the facts.

        The Gotch

        Like

        1. Cornelius Gotchberg wrote, “Christina Blasey-Ford, who, if memory serves, you chose to defend to the death.”

          From the things I’ve read, I’m not sure that is quite accurate. The only thing I could personally find that AnonyBob wrote about Kavanaugh was this, “I can’t accuse Kavanaugh of being a serial rapist; I’m aware of only one incident.”, which is AnonyBob acknowledging that he thinks that Kavanaugh raped someone based on the unsupportable accusations at that point in time (August 26, 2019 at 6:46 am) it’s pretty clear that AnonyBob swallowed the anti-Kavanaugh rape accusations.

          The difference between the 11th hour Kavanaugh accusations and the 11th hour Tara Reade accusations is that the Tara Reade has “some” actual credible substance to it in that Reade told multiple people about the alleged incident at the time it happened plus Reade can prove that she knew Biden because she actually worked for him in the U.S. Senate. I don’t know if the accusation is true or not.

          What’s not so surprising about this Tara Reade story is that the lefts’ propaganda news media outlets have a near black out in regards to the Tara Reade story but they ran many hundreds of stories about the Kavanaugh accusations and fully jumped on board with the #MeeToo crowd and actively tried to convict Kavanaugh in the court of public opinion with unsupportable accusations but nope, they won’t do that to their only hope for the White House, Candidate Joe Biden.

          When it comes to the Tara Reade story, Lefty Blind Hypocrisy Is On Full Display!!!

          Liked by 1 person

        2. Cornelius Gotchberg

          Perhaps “defend to the death” states it a tad too strongly, something The Gotch would NEVER want levy; especially to his erstwhile pal AnonyBob.

          If it wasn’t that, still, AnonyBob was certainlyALL IN on rape most foul, the flighiest/flimsiest of evidence and presumption of innocence be damned.

          Quoth he: “YOU (Righties) ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY.
          Prediction: Kavanaugh Withdraws.

          Which begs the same question; are Lefties on the wrong side of history, here? Not with the full force of the Lefty media running interference for them, they’re not; it won’t be seen that way, leastways.

          Heck, no career Lefty any less than the talented Leonard Pitts has deemed Reade an appropriate sacrifice:

          (bolds/caps mine throughout)
          “Small wonder many of us consider Trump’s re-election incompatible with national survival.

          If Reade were sacrificed to the cause of preventing that, IT WOULD BE PAINFUL AND UNFAIR, YET ARGUABLY DEFENSIBLE. Because IF THERE ARE TWO EVILS HERE, Biden is much the lesser.

          But let us at least admit, if only in the silence of individual conscience, that this is the calculation we’ve made, the terrible choice forced on us by the exigencies of a fraught moment. We live now in paradox and emergency where, heaven help us, principle (and ethics) may have become a luxury too costly to afford.

          In a nutshell; if it takes one life, let it be Tara Reade’s.

          How many EA rationalizations in there?

          The Gotch

          Liked by 1 person

        3. “Quoth he: “YOU (Righties) ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY.

          Prediction: Kavanaugh Withdraws.”

          Yup there’s a thread I never saw. That was quite a prediction from a political novice suffering from Acute Propaganda-Induced Anti-Trump Hysteria Syndrome who clearly get’s his political opinions spoon fed to him from the trough of CNN and MSNBC.

          It appears that AnonyBob was on the wrong side of history – again! How much cash did Dave Blaska get from the bet? I’ll bet none, after all it was just more of AnonyBob’s mindless blustering hackery.

          Liked by 1 person

        4. “Quoth he: “YOU (Righties) ARE ON THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY.

          Prediction: Kavanaugh Withdraws.”

          Yup there’s a thread I never saw. That was quite a prediction from a political novice suffering from Acute Propaganda-Induced Anti-Trump Hysteria Syndrome who clearly get’s his political opinions spoon fed to him from the trough of CNN and MSNBC.

          It appears that AnonyBob was on the wrong side of history – again! How much cash did Dave Blaska get from the bet? I’ll bet none, after all it was just more of AnonyBob’s mindless blustering hackery.

          Liked by 1 person

      2. As for Trump; he is still innocent until proven guilty just like Biden, but in Trumps case(s) they’ll have to wait until he’s no longer the sitting President of the United States where a prosecutor could charge Biden right now.

        Like

  10. AnonyBob

    You mindless, unethical hacks are hilarious! “Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh!” Then I guess, to be consistent, I would have to question Biden’s nomination to the Supreme Court. All I can say is, “Grab ‘em by the pussy!” Trump doesn’t need to be tried; he’s already confessed to assaulting women, he bragged about it. Are you SURE you want to go down this road?

    Like

    1. AnonyBob wrote, “Trump doesn’t need to be tried; he’s already confessed to assaulting women, he bragged about it.”

      Trump is a brash locker room shit talker but confess to assaulting women; when? It certainly wasn’t the pussy grabbing statements, he said you “can” he didn’t say he “did” – check the transcripts. Context and comprehension matters in real world but in the irrational fantasy world of the political left these days nothing seems to matter as long as it’s attacking Trump – the ends justifies the means.

      Like

      1. In any event he said “they let you do it.” That sounds pretty consensual.

        Liked by 1 person

    2. AnonyBob wrote, “Trump doesn’t need to be tried; he’s already confessed to assaulting women, he bragged about it.”

      Trump is a brash locker room shit talker but confess to assaulting women; when? It certainly wasn’t the pussy grabbing statements, he said you “can” he didn’t say he “did” – check the transcripts. Context and comprehension matters in real world but in the irrational fantasy world of the political left these days nothing seems to matter as long as it’s attacking Trump – the ends justifies the means.

      Like

      1. Cornelius Gotchberg

        “Context and comprehension matters in real world but in the irrational fantasy world of the political left these days nothing seems to matter”

        Alas; when Lefty & a fact-based reality are neck-n-neck, it’s the latter that must pull over!

        The Gotch

        Liked by 1 person

  11. AnonyBob

    Something else a prosecutor would consider is pattern of behavior. In 44 years of high public office, including being vetted for the vice presidency, Biden has never had another woman accuse him of something like this. Everyone who knows him, even his opponents, considers him a decent man of high character. No one considers Trump a decent man of high character (and it’s sad that this means nothing to the Trump GOP). He doesn’t just have a pattern of assaulting women, he has a habit of it. Let’s have this discussion.

    Like

    1. Cornelius Gotchberg

      ”Let’s have this discussion.”

      Nah; let’s have THIS ONE

      Joe Biden got Away With It For Eight Years

      (bolds mine throughout)
      “For a long time, Democrats benefited from a media mentality that almost always interpreted their traits through the most positive lens.

      “Rahm Emanuel’s stabbing a table with a steak knife or sending a dead fish to some pollster wasn’t seen as a sign of psychological instability or rage issues; that behavior demonstrated he was a passionate, fiery competitor with a relentless drive.

      “Bill Clinton was a passionate extrovert who wanted to connect with people, not a shameless womanizer.

      “Al Gore was a brilliant, detail-oriented technocrat, not a mildly dysfunctional robot failing to fool people that he’s a human being.”

      The lickspittle media is covering for Dementia Joe the same way they’re covering for an L-Dopa addled SanFranNan.

      The same way they covered for Hopey Changey:
      *he “found out about” Crooked Hillarity “in the papers,”
      *he never heard, over 20 + years, ANY RAYcism whatsoever from Reverend Hate America First Jeremiah Wright,
      *he ONLY knew murderer/domestic terrorist/Hopey Changey Ghost-Writer William Ayers as “some guy from the neighborhood,” and
      *he never Never NEVER cavorted with virulent RAYcist/anti-semite Louis Farrakhan.

      Shoot, that’s just off’n the top of The Gotch’s head; probably aren’t any other examples….right….?

      CNN?? Fuggeddaboudit!
      *Kavanaugh/Christine Blasey-Ford related stories– > 700.
      *Dementia Joe/Tara Reade related stories (as of 04/18/2020)– 1 (one).

      Media bias? We don’t got no stinkin’ media bias!

      The Gotch

      Like

      1. AnonyBob

        Wow, what a great defense of the Pussy-Grabber-in-Chief. Not.
        Good ol’ Gootch: The Gibberish King of Deflection.

        Like

        1. madisonexpat

          Trump’s statement was “If you’re a celebrity THEY LET you do anything. You can grab them by the pussy….”
          ABob would have excoriated Mr. Rogers as a serial gang rapist if President Trump named him to the supreme court. This is as certain as ABob heard Trump state that NAZIS are good people.
          ABob is a liar. His justification for trying to destroy a good man, Justice Kavanaugh, was his post was for life. It was pure evil. ABob and the Democrat Party were all in. The result?
          Karma.

          Liked by 1 person

        2. AnonyBob

          Come down from that high horse, Splat. I’m no more a liar than you. I call ‘em like I see ‘em as do you, you just don’t like me pointing out your emperor’s nakedness. Yes, “if you’re a celebrity THEY LET you…” – he was talking about himself and women have confirmed his behavior. Are you seriously suggesting his victims ALLOWED his groping? Uh, ask any female, even Mrs. Splat, about that. And he did indeed claim there were good people “on both sides” while talking about the Nazis and the ones protesting the Nazis. It’s hard to parse that any other way, unless you’re a Trumpster. Facts about Trump are a bitch, especially when they trigger you.

          Like

        3. AnonyBob wrote, “And he did indeed claim there were good people “on both sides” while talking about the Nazis and the ones protesting the Nazis.”

          NO AnonyBob they weren’t all Nazi’s on one side and those protesting Nazi’s on the other side, only a complete imbecile would continue parroting that utter nonsense.

          Like

        4. Don’t let the facts get in the way of your Trump hatred, A-Bob. From the actual transcript:

          “There were people in that rally — and I looked the night before — if you look, there were people protesting very quietly the taking down of the statue of Robert E. Lee. I’m sure in that group there were some bad ones. The following day it looked like they had some rough, bad people — neo-Nazis, white nationalists, whatever you want to call them.

          “But you had a lot of people in that group that were there to innocently protest, and very legally protest — because, I don’t know if you know, they had a permit. The other group didn’t have a permit. So I only tell you this: There are two sides to a story. I thought what took place was a horrible moment for our country — a horrible moment.  But there are two sides to the country.

          After more give and take with the news media:

          “Excuse me, they didn’t put themselves down as neo-Nazis, and you had some very bad people in that group.  But you also had people that were very fine people on both sides.  You had people in that group – excuse me, excuse me, I saw the same pictures you did.  You had people in that group that were there to protest the taking down of, to them, a very, very important statue and the renaming of a park from Robert E. Lee to another name.”

          After another question at that press conference, Trump became even more explicit:

          “I’m not talking about the neo-Nazis and white nationalists because they should be condemned totally.” 

          More here: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2019/03/21/trump_didnt_call_neo-nazis_fine_people_heres_proof_139815.html

          Liked by 1 person

        5. Cornelius Gotchberg

          Gibberish /ˈjib(ə)riSH/
          noun
          1-Intellectually prepubescent label AnonyBob incuriously applies to real real mean Inconvenient Truth which not only refuses to support the LaLaLoopyLoonyLeftyLand narrative and herd the uneducated feral class Lefty base, but just won’t go away.

          The Gotch

          Liked by 1 person

  12. georgessson

    RE: John Peterson and A-Bob, I’m really NOT going all “Ad Hominem” here -I only reply as a responsible adult. By God’s Teeth, could either of ya post sumpin’ coherent and less obvious? By less obvious, I mean that the electro-shock (or a frontal lobotomy) has failed miserably? P’raps there’s hope fer ya both. Ongoing studies of TDS are yet to be published.

    Like

    1. AnonyBob

      Whew, thank goodness you avoided the ad hominems.
      And your comment…that the best ya got? You need worry about your Trump Denialist Syndrome.

      Like

      1. madisonexpat

        ABob remains a liar with a bagful of weasel words, check out his seminar in Lefty dishonesty:
        1) State a falsehood ex. 17 intel agencies all agree Russia hacked our election. Repeat a few times and it magically becomes a “fact”. And overnight “everybody” agrees.
        2) Some women like wealthy celebrities and will have consensual sex with them. Never a whisper of sexual assault in Trump’s long life….. until he is a contender for the presidency. Then Harvey Weensteen’s lawyers Ms. Allred and her daughter troll for and parade many women who will say Trump wronged them until he said ‘put up or see me in court’. They all fled. Quelle coincidence.
        3) If I don’t believe this BS I am a “Trump Denialist” even though the Left can produce zero credible evidence for their accusations. (Hmmmm… Denialist…. seems I’ve heard that elsewhere.)
        4) ABob calls the president the “pussy grabber in chief” until an extremely credible woman states that Good Old Joe grabbed her pussy against her will because… Karma.
        5) ABob states that no one has ever alleged anything untoward about Quid Pro Joe in his long, public life but ABob was all in on trying to destroy Justice Kavanaugh because he drank a lot of beer in high school and some lying bimbo told lies about an innocent man that had been vetted by the FBI seven times but never head a whisper about him being a serial gang rapist.
        6) Trump likes NAZIS. This is too ridiculous to rehash.

        So yes, ABob is still a liar, but maybe he can deny it to himself.

        Like