‘Soviet-style impeachment’

Some off-the-cuff impressions from this morning’s (10-31-19) House of Representatives impeachment debate, written in real time.

Two visual impressions. One of the Democrats spoke in front of a placard of Donald Trump with the words “Do Me a Favor” superimposed over the President’s lips.

Republican minority whip Steve Scalise countered with his own poster: the onion domes of the Kremlin with the legend: “37 Days of Soviet-style impeachment proceedings.” (Video here.)

Scalise Soviet

That about sums it up. Democrats are doing a dry run of the actual impeachment; they chided Republicans for talking about process, process, process. But the subject of today’s vote was process — what rules would government an impeachment. Come to it, the Constitution of the U.S. is nothing but process. No content, no policy, no appropriation. The Constitution is a rule book at the foundational level. 

Republican minority leader Kevin McCarthy said the only purpose of impeachment was to undo the results of the last election and to influence the next election, now barely one year hence.

He quoted Alexander Hamilton in the Federalist Papers who warned “there is always a great danger that impeachment will be driven by partisan animosity.” Republicans objected that:

  • Republicans cannot introduce witnesses unless the Democratic chairman approves.
  • The White House counsel may not be present without approval of the Democratic chairman.
  • The so-called whistle blower remains anonymous.
  • Why has Adam Schiff’s Intelligence Committee taken the lead?
  • There’s still no vote to authorize an impeachment inquiry.

What do YOU think?

About David Blaska

Madison WI
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to ‘Soviet-style impeachment’

  1. lEO says:

    oF COURSE IT’S “sOVIET STYLE”, BUT ONLY TO PLEASE mR. tRUMP. All roads lead to
    Putin and Moscow for mr. Trump. So, let’s make him feel at home and do it his way!


  2. AnonyBob says:

    I’m sorry I was out of town and allowed this load of RWNJ manure to slide by unchallenged. If “undoing the election” means you shouldn’t impeach for impeachable offenses, why does the Constitution provide for impeachment?


Comments are closed.